Catholic Excommunication Revealed

When Should Bishops Declare A
Catholic Excommunication

By Bishop Robert Vasa

Catholic Excommunication Exposed

Catholic Excommunication Exposed

BEND — During the course of this past year there have been a number of occasions when bishops have hinted to laity that being Catholic involves a bit more than claiming the title. This has been done, in  particular, with regard to politicians who may, in their own way, love Jesus, who may attend Sunday Mass and who do identify themselves as “faithful” Catholics. The press usually hints at the big “E” word, excommunication. The question of when a Catholic should be excommunicated has even been asked quite frequently and very seriously. While bishops are extremely reluctant to take the seemingly dramatic step of excommunication, I think there is very good reason for us to explore more thoroughly what excommunication really means and why it might be considered in certain circumstances.

The press would undoubtedly accuse Bishops who talk or even think about excommunication as being tyrannical power mongers but this is unfair.

  • Excommunication is a declaration, based on solid evidence, that the actions or public teachings of a particular Catholic are categorically incompatible with the teachings of the Church.

Why Catholic Excommunication?

  1. It is intended primarily as a means of getting the person who is in grave error to recognize the depth of his error and repent.
  2. While somewhat secondary but no less important, is to assure the faithful who truly are faithful that what they believe to be the teaching of the Church is true and correct.

Allowing their faith to be shaken or allowing them to be confused when Catholics publicly affirm something contrary to faith or morals, seemingly without consequences, scandalizes and confuses the faithful.

Scandalizing The Faithful Is Grave Matter

This scandalization is no small matter. The Church, and particularly bishops, have an obligation to defend the faith but they also have an obligation to protect the faithful. We do not generally see the dissidence of public figures as something that harms the faithful but it has a deleterious effect upon them.

How To Support Courageous Bishop

I find, very frequently, when I speak a bit more boldly on matters of morality or discipline, there are a significant number of the faithful who send messages of gratitude and support. It is their gratitude which stirs my heart for it makes me realize how much there is a need to support and affirm the clear and consistent teachings of our Catholic faith for the sake of the faithful. While the press may caricature such bishops in rather uncharitable fashion, I trust that they are men devoted to true compassion and to the truth itself.

The Fruits Of Courageous Bishops

Their compassion extends to those who are misled and to those who, while not misled, are discouraged when their faith is attacked without rebuttal. This discouragement of the faithful is not insignificant. When we look at the word itself we see that its root is “courage” and allowing someone’s courage to be dissipated, or “dissed” as the young might say, is harmful to the person.

  • Encouragement, by contrast, builds up the courage of the faithful and increases their strength for doing good.
  • It is life giving and revitalizing.
  • Allowing error, publicly expressed, to stand without comment or contradiction is discouraging.

Should Communion Be Denied?

When that moral error is espoused publicly by a Catholic who, by the likewise public and external act of receiving Holy Communion, appears to be in “good standing” then the faithful are doubly confused and doubly discouraged. In that case, the error is certainly not refuted. Furthermore, the impression is given that the error is positively condoned by the bishop and the Church. This is very discouraging to the faithful. In such a case, private “dialogue” is certainly appropriate but a public statement is also needed. In extreme cases, excommunication may be deemed necessary.

Catholics Excommunicate Themselves

It seems to me that even if a decree of excommunication would be issued, the bishop would really not excommunicate anyone. A Bishop only declares that the person is excommunicated by virtue of the person’s own actions. The actions and words, contrary to faith and morals, are what excommunicate (i.e. break communion with the Church). When matters are serious and public, the Bishop may deem it necessary to declare that lack of communion explicitly.

This declaration no more causes the excommunication than a doctor who diagnoses diabetes causes the diabetes he finds in his patient. The doctor recognizes the symptoms and writes the necessary prescription. Accusing the doctor of being a tyrannical power monger would never cross anyone’s mind. Even when the doctor tells the patient that they are “excommunicated” from sugar it is clear that his desire is solely the health of his patient. In fact, a doctor who told his diabetic patient that he could keep ingesting all the sugar he wanted without fear would be found grossly negligent and guilty of malpractice.

Before A Catholic Is Excommunicated

In the same way, bishops who recognize a serious spiritual malady and seek a prescription to remedy the error, after discussion and warning, may be required to simply state, “What you do and say is gravely wrong and puts you out of communion with the faith you claim to hold.” In serious cases, and the cases of misled Catholic public officials are often very serious, a declaration of the fact that the person is de facto out of communion may be the only responsible and charitable thing to do.

Fearing To Offend Is Not The Answer

Failing to name error because of some kind of fear of offending the person in error is neither compassion nor charity. Confronting or challenging the error or evil of another is never easy yet it must be done.

The adage usually attributed to Edmund Burke was correct: All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.

Will Shepherds Start Defending The Truth

The Lord has called bishops to be shepherds. That shepherding entails both leading and protecting. In an era when error runs rampant and false teachings abound, the voice of the Holy Father rings clear and true. The teachings of the Church are well documented and consistent. Bishops and the pastors who serve in their Dioceses have an obligation both to lead their people to the truth and protect them from error.

Headlines Added By John Quinn with slight edited

P.S. – Would you do Courageous Priest a favor and share this info with your friends on Facebook, Twitter or Email right now? We truly appreciate it. Or leave a comment, we would love to hear what you think.

2 comments to Catholic Excommunication Exposed

  • M. Russell

    Does this apply to German Catholics who choose to not pay the Religion Tax?

  • Bob Withrow

    Excommunication. What a misunderstood word. A person is in communion with a church when he/she accepts the essential teachings of that church and acts upon them including receiving the Sacraments. A person who does not accept the essential teachings of a church has a priori taken themselves out of communion with the church. It does not mean that person is damned, condemned, or anything else of the sort.

    I speak as one who, by my owe actions and beliefs, is excommunicated from the Roman Church. St. Thomas Aquinas exhorted us to properly inform our conscience and then to follow that informed conscience. I became Roman Catholic at age 20, completed studies for priesthood, joined the Franciscans, and eventually left. I tried to be a good Catholic but found I had significant disagreements with a couple of areas of essential Catholic teaching. I prayed, studied, consulted with my spiritual director, and discussed my situation with a couple of priests. My conscience told me I could not believe as I did and remain in communion with the Roman Catholic Church.

    I started attending an Independent Catholic parish. Over time I accepted ordination to priesthood and consecration to the episcopacy in that denomination. By doing so, I incurred automatic excommunication from the Roman Church but, in reality, I placed myself out of communion when I could not accept some essential Catholic teachings. The day I left the Roman Catholic Church was a sad day for me but it was necessary for me. Benedict XVI once stated he would rather have a smaller church if it meant the faithful were truely faithful to official teachings. I absolutely agree with him.

    If any readers of this comment believe they cannot accept certain essential teachings of the Roman Catholic Church, I encourage them to not just walk away. You have a sacred obligation to yourself, the church, and God to do everything you can to inform your conscience. This is never an easy and always a painful process. If, in the end, you cannot reconcile yourself to the Church’s teachings, then and only then should you leave and seek communion elsewhere.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>