Archbishop Chaput: About Those Unthinking, Backward Catholics

By Archbishop Charles Chaput, Archdiocese of Philadelphia:

Back in 2008, in the weeks leading up to the Obama-McCain presidential election, two young men visited me in Denver.  They were from Catholics United, a group describing itself as committed to social justice issues.  They voiced great concern at the manipulative skill of Catholic agents for the Republican Party.  And they hoped my brother bishops and I would resist identifying the Church with single-issue and partisan (read: abortion) politics.

It was an interesting experience.  Both men were obvious flacks for the Obama campaign and the Democratic Party — creatures of a political machine, not men of the Church; less concerned with Catholic teaching than with its influence.  And presumably (for them) bishops were dumb enough to be used as tools, or at least prevented from helping the other side.  Yet these two young men not only equaled but surpassed their Republican cousins in the talents of servile partisan hustling.  Thanks to their work, and activists like them, American Catholics helped to elect an administration that has been the most stubbornly unfriendly to religious believers, institutions, concerns and liberty in generations.

I never saw either young man again.  The cultural damage done by the current White House has – apparently — made courting America’s bishops unnecessary.

But bad can always get worse.  I’m thinking, of course, of the contemptuously anti-Catholic emails exchanged among members of the Clinton Democratic presidential campaign team and released this week by WikiLeaks. A sample:  Sandy Newman, president of Voices for Progress, emailed John Podesta, now the head of Hillary Clinton’s campaign, to ask about whether “the bishops opposing contraceptive coverage” could be the tinder for a revolution. “There needs to be a Catholic Spring, in which Catholics themselves demand the end of a middle ages [sic] dictatorship,” Newman writes.

Of course, Newman added, “this idea may just reveal my total lack of understanding of the Catholic church, the economic power it can bring to bear against nuns and priests who count on it for their maintenance.” Still, he wondered, how would one “plant the seeds of a revolution”? John Podesta replied that “We created Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good to organize for a moment like this . . . likewise Catholics United” (emphasis added).

Another Clinton-related email, from John Halpin of the Center for American Progress, mocks Catholics in the so-called conservative movement, especially converts: “They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations and must be totally unaware of Christian democracy.” In a follow-up, he adds “They can throw around ‘Thomistic’ thought and ‘subsidiarity’ and sound sophisticated because no one knows what . . . they’re talking about.”

On the evening these WikiLeaks emails were released, I received the following angry email myself, this one from a nationally respected (non-Catholic) attorney experienced in Church-state affairs:

I was deeply offended by the [Clinton team] emails, which are some of the worst bigotry by a political machine I have seen.  [A] Church has an absolute right to protect itself when under attack as a faith and Church by civil political forces. That certainly applies here . . .

 “Over the last eight years there has been strong evidence that the current administration, with which these people share values, has been very hostile to religious organizations.  Now there is clear proof that this approach is deliberate and will accelerate if these actors have any continuing, let alone louder, say in government.  

 “These bigots are actively strategizing how to shape Catholicism not to be Catholic or consistent with Jesus’ teachings, but to be the ‘religion’ they want.  They are, at the very core, trying to turn religion to their secular view of right and wrong consistent with their politics.  This is fundamentally why the Founders left England and demanded that government not have any voice in religion.  Look where we are now.  We have political actors trying to orchestrate a coup to destroy Catholic values, and they even analogize their takeover to a coup in the Middle East, which amplifies their bigotry and hatred of the Church.  I had hoped I would never see this day — a day like so many dark days in Eastern Europe that led to the death of my [Protestant minister] great grandfather at the hands of communists who also hated and wanted to destroy religion.”

 Of course it would be wonderful for the Clinton campaign to repudiate the content of these ugly WikiLeaks emails. All of us backward-thinking Catholics who actually believe what Scripture and the Church teach would be so very grateful.

In the meantime, a friend describes the choice facing voters in November this way: A vulgar, boorish lout and disrespecter of women, with a serious impulse control problem; or a scheming, robotic liar with a lifelong appetite for power and an entourage riddled with anti-Catholic bigots.

In a nation where “choice” is now the unofficial state religion, the menu for dinner is remarkably small.

P.S. – Would you do Courageous Priest a favor and share this info with your friends on Facebook, Twitter or Email right now? We truly appreciate it. Or leave a comment, we would love to hear what you think.

5 comments to Archbishop Chaput: About Those Unthinking, Backward Catholics

  • Linda Rafacz

    My many prayers for all our Catholic Bishops and priests. Thank you for all that you do for us.

  • Frank Dynan

    I think that HRC is also a disrespecter of any woman who threatens her ambitions by exposing the sexual assaults of her husband.

    I’ll take the vulgar, boorish lout. He respects the common man.

  • Gwee Doe

    While I appreciate and respect what Archbishop Chaput has said here, he dismisses Trump too off-handedly. As Archbishop Sheen said, the difference between a bad person and an evil person is that the bad person murders rapes, steals, and the evil person wants to “destroy the good in the other.” So the choice is clear. Besides, while there is no evidence of Trump doing such bad things, Trump to his credit has faithful Catholics as part of his team and there is no evidence he “hates women.” One could make a case for libel against those that make such claims. Clinton on the other hand is a hard-core Communist. I use this term in the true sense of its original meaning. She is a disciple of Saul Alinsky and her thirst for power and money has no bounds …. None. Given the chance she will exercise her powers as a tyrant that will make Stalin proud.

  • Mariann

    Your Excellency, Archbishop Chaput, when you were in Denver, why did you not stop what was obviously the “elephant in the living room”? How many have, are and will perish due to your silence and inaction? This along with your fellow Bishops have allowed the One True Faith in America to be undermined and infiltrated with self-proclaimed “progressive Catholics.” How often I have heard good about you–yet, just as often have I read unbelievably awful items of your stance or lack thereof on reception of the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Catholics professing intrinsic evils. We are in need of the intervention of the Holy Spirit. I pray that you and your fellow Bishops stand atop your steeples if need be to STOP the most corrupt regime to continue through Saul Alinsky’s second disciple, H.R.Clinton. You have my daily prayers.

    By the way, the ending of the one intrinsic evil of abortion being pushed for how many years by some honest Republicans can be viewed during this 15 seconds of life…times over 56 million in the U.S. alone…it could have been you, me, St. Mother Theresa…

  • Gail Bonagofski

    DJT is not the man of the past. He is the future. He is the product of a fallen society. The platform is what counts. DJT’s past prepared him for this task. It takes a bold fighter to stop Hillary. I am not one to judge but I see a good heart in DJT.

Leave a Reply to Gail Bonagofski Cancel reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>